Washington Post has 5 historians opining on how Bush will stack up against other US presidents, and they're not saying very good things about Bush. The problem here, to me, is that we voted to affirm Bush as president - twice. Were the signs not there in 2000 and 2004? C-student from Yale? Failed as an oilman? Alcoholic? I mean, there are 10 million plus eligible Presidents (and by eligible, I mean rich white American men above the age of 35) and we can't find a better candidate? Worst president of all time or worst job voting, two times in a row?

Liked what you read? I am available for hire.