Author Archives: kevin

About kevin

I write the posts

Fall 2008 Semester Review

I'm back home after ending my first semester at Claremont McKenna College. I was pretty unhappy on the drive home, but when I put the whole thing in perspective I think I had a great semester. You wish you could have had it. Positives: Social scientists and economists recently have made breakthroughs into learning what makes us happy, what makes us productive, and what attracts people to each other. Learning to use time efficiently, to avoid emotional rollercoasters, and to deal with people are probably more important than the academic material. In no particular order: I learned how to brew beer and started learning the tango, waltz and polka in two hours a week of dance instruction. We brewed three batches and I finished 5th place in an open tango competition. I learned how to use the weight room to become stronger and put on weight. I gained eleven pounds but stopped working out when finals approached and lost five. Good grades are the result of a good process, not any inherent measure of intelligence. Some things that helped me get good grades:
  • I kept organized for the whole semester. I wrote down due dates and appointments in a planner, and used it to plan out schedules of when I would get things done. I kept a binder for every class, with dividers for lecture notes, homework, handouts, and tests and essays.
  • With a few exceptions I didn't work for more than 2 hours at a time; when I wasn't getting work done I went to bed or did other things. I studied no more than 4 hours a day as finals approached, and scored above 95% on every exam, just by starting studying earlier and working efficiently.
  • I sat in the front row for every class. I would estimate staying organized is worth half a letter grade, and sitting in the front row is worth a quarter of a letter grade.
I aligned my desire to earn money with my desire for good work habits. When I wanted to ensure I got something done I would tell a friend I owed them a donation or a sandwich if I didn't finish an essay on time, or go to the gym. I also bet my parents that I would wear my retainer for 18 hours a day. The retainer makes me look and sound a little childish but it's straightening my teeth and I only have to wear it for half a year. These sort of bets are extremely cheap arbitrage - good grades and straight teeth are worth more later (in the job/marriage market) than they are now, so a small incentive now can pay big dividends later. Often these bets were win-win propositions - if I won I got my essay done on time, but if I lost I created a social opportunity, having to buy someone a sandwich. I tried out for, and failed to make, the varsity basketball team. I was in the gym for nearly three hours a day for the first six weeks of the semester, lifting, shooting, running sprints, and playing pickup against the other varsity players. I wanted to make the team so that I could have a group of friends, signal quality to others, compete every day, and improve my basketball skill. My fitness was excellent and I improved at defense, dribbling, and driving. Fortunately, by the time the tryout came around I had enough other things going on around campus that I was (I told myself, anyway) indifferent between making the team and getting cut. The coach wanted me to become a student manager but I refused - I am slowly learning that just because someone wants me to do something doesn't mean I have an obligation to do it. I would have probably accepted the offer a year ago. While I was trying out for the basketball team I was sober for six weeks. My mantra was constant competition; every time I saw a player drink I was winning. I learned for myself that the social benefit from alcohol is imaginary, and that having a good time is based more on your attitude than your state of inebriation. I maintained good spirits and a social attitude well into December, which I hadn't done in my previous semesters at college. I learned to be more careful about the signals I sent to others. Claremont McKenna's small campus was a big help. I couldn't help running into people that I knew. I tried to call friends ahead of time to get meals so I wouldn't eat alone, which worked when I remembered to do it. I did not waste too much time. I had a rule not to check my email or RSS before noon. I let feeds, emails, texts and friend requests accumulate, dealing with them in my own time, rather than read and respond instantly to everything. I started writing againafter two years of Penn lecture classes (Total writing output between May '07 and October '08: 2 crappy application essays). The only way to become good at something is to practice (with feedback) as much as you can. Writing is no exception; the more I write the easier it becomes to write. I blogged for my Gov 20 Honors class nearly every day, and when I started to get a "You should write about this!" thought bubble for non-political topics I revived my own blog. Every essay or short paper I write starts from an outline, which helped me stay focused and get work done. Negatives: The negatives are of the "idle Tuesday" variety and don't merit mention, which is something I've learned this semester too.

Liked what you read? I am available for hire.

Books I Read This Semester

Homer, The Iliad

Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

The Federalist Papers

Don Norman, The Design of Everyday Things

Timothy Ferriss, The 4-Hour Work Week

Sophocles, Oedipus

Ian McEwan, Atonement

David Foster Wallace, Consider the Lobster and other essays

Shakespeare, A Midsummer Night's Dream

Tom Wolfe, I Am Charlotte Simmons

Ronald Brownstein, The Second Civil War: How Extreme Partisanship Has Paralyzed Washington and Polarized America

Samuel Huntington, Who Are We? The Challenges to America's National Identity

Liked what you read? I am available for hire.

Predicting teacher quality

Malcolm Gladwell has a long article in New Yorker about problems schools face predicting which people will be good at teaching. In summary, teachers are the most important factor affecting student learning, more important than class size, or a "good" school vs a "bad" school. Schools can't predict which teachers will be good, but the current pay structure and tenure system makes it difficult to remove bad teachers and reward good ones, and as a result no one's really happy with school quality. Gladwell says we should open up the discipline to anybody who proves they're competent, and rework the pay schedules so that we can eliminate bad teachers more easily and keep the good ones.

My response is:

Duh!


Shout it from the rooftops, Malcolm! This set of conclusions must not be obvious to some people. Teacher quality matters. I spent four hours in the Dean of Faculty's office sorting through teacher evaluations, picking out the best teachers, because I want to make sure I get good teachers. I want to put those evaluations online for everyone to see, and why teacher's unions are pure evil and the main obstacle to school improvement today. School effectiveness is all about culling and removing bad teachers and giving the good ones bonuses to get them to stay. Bad teachers are cancerous parts of a school. They don't mean to be awful, but they are.

Liked what you read? I am available for hire.

Easiest to “make it” in which of the following fields?

Assuming you have enough qualifications to start at the entry level:

Writer
Basketball/other sport coach
Musician
Traditional career to CEO
Academic
Entrepreneur
Finance

Writing, music, and entrepreneurship are scalable at every level - pay is tied to output and demand, there's no billable "per hour" component. Beginning careerists, academics, Wall Street lifers and coaches are paid a fixed salary, but as people move up the ladder their salaries become more tied to output and less tied to a per-hour consideration.

In which fields are the skills necessary to be successful relevant to the material? For example, to become CEO you must master office politics, and to be a successful coach you have to be able to recruit players. I guess these are part of the job description in each case.

My initial reaction is that difficulty depends on two factors - the size of the field and the amount of luck required. It's difficult to be a lucky coach or a lucky academic, but extremely easy to be lucky in finance, almost as easy in music, a little harder in writing. There is also a political aspect - consider which fields we would expect someone's son or daughter to have a leg up on the competition.

Entrepreneurship may be the easiest but the perceived risk of entry is the highest.

Liked what you read? I am available for hire.

Ads That Don’t Make Sense

Why is the chair of this Senate committee speaking in a British accent? What does it say about how Americans view British people?

Liked what you read? I am available for hire.

Links for today

Here are amazing pictures of the Hajj, the religious ceremony all Muslims are expected to undergo.

Here is an explanation of the reconfiguring of Jamarat Bridge, or, how to solve the logistical problem of getting 3 million people to throw rocks at three pillars without any of them getting trampled.

How to talk to girls, the author is 9

The best laid plans going awry

T.S. Eliot's The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, about mediocrity in middle and old age, but written when he was an undergraduate. Is the poem supposed to be a warning or a general complaint about the state of modern life?

NPR has a record number of viewers, but faces a $23 million deficit and thus is cutting Day to Day and News & Notes. This is troublesome but a usual theme in public radio. I am wondering what happened to the $200 million bequest from Joan Kroc in 2003.

The Economist on new technology that allows cars to avoid collisions. The tradeoffs there deserve their own post. I'm not as convinced of the case for driverless cars.

Liked what you read? I am available for hire.

Give other people a chance to like you

Sometimes you'll be unhappy because things aren't working out socially. No one ever calls/invites you to do things, you feel excluded, you don't know who you're going to live with next year, you're eating alone all the time and you wish you could do things with other people more often. I would know because I've been in this position most places I've been since I finished high school. In this position it's very tempting to blame others. But in most cases, the problem lies particularly close to home. If you've never been in this spot, the rest of this article will feel like absurd cheerleading.

You have to give people the opportunity to like you. I read this in a brochure three months ago and it's stuck with me since then. If you sit off by yourself at meals, in classes, or turn down a social opportunity on the weekend, you're sending a signal that you'd like to be left alone. It's tempting to hope other people realize you don't know a whole lot of people and you're feeling a little intimidated, but this is grasping at thin air; people are more worried first and foremost about their own lives in the worst case. Instead walk with your head up, be positive and make the first move. If this is overwhelming try to do a conversation with just one classmate or one other student each day. My favorite is to say "Hi, I don't think we met, I'm Kevin. I just transferred here. What's your name?"

Second, stop judging people.Just stop. Don't do it. Don't talk behind people's backs, either. Ignore what your peers say about your other peers. Approach every new person like they're the most interesting person you've ever met and you'd love to be friends with them. No one's perfect, not even yourself, so stop blocking until you find that perfect group of friends. You're not.

Lastly, walk with your head up and don't forget to smile a lot. I've noticed confidentpeople and people talking on the phone don't look around - looking straight where you're going, or on who you're talking to, is a sign that whatever you're doing is the most interesting going.

Hope it helps.

Addendum: It appears that happiness is contagious. All the more reason to smile a lot and hang out with cheerful people.

Liked what you read? I am available for hire.

Thoughts for the day

What if you organized school as a bunch of one or two-week mini-classes dealing with one idea, one book, one poem or one scientific concept? Classes are usually a series of six or ten related ideas. I was thinking about this because my habits are usually excellent at the beginning of the semester and then slowly sink into worse and worse habits. I was wondering if my habits would keep up if the scenery changed once a week. Maybe the only solution is to put money on the line. My initial thought is that this would be chaotic but we have computers to sort out the best schedules. It's hard to evaluate the merits without testing it out. I'm not sure overall learning would decrease. The drawbacks are more obvious than the merits, however.

Also does a companion's level of interest have any bearing on how interested you are? If someone deeply likes you would you be more interested in them, or is attraction based on other factors? Does it do any good to signal a high level of attraction?

I'm taking the Putnam Exam today. I would be pretty happy if I got a 2 on the exam.

Liked what you read? I am available for hire.